🗺 Every page — the whole flow
The votes
Open questionsElections — when, where, howVoter turnoutPriorities boardWhat came of itGet involved
The budget
▶ Take the 2-minute tourThe money trailYour tax bill, explainedCities & townsGrants — money we could go getWho gets paidWhat the auditors reportedThe receipt — arithmetic checkedThe documentsHow every number is sourcedQuestions people ask — answered from the dataThe plain-words tour
Public needs
Our waterJails & prisons — from holding to buildingWho’s watching — cameras, plate readers, the rulesWho to call — county and state officesFind help
Dead ends & open questions
The docketThe calendarHow complete is this county?
Research for a better county
What if we saved?Tax lab — change the taxesCommonwealth — our own moneyReceipts by railsFood sovereigntyGrow-opsThe food flywheelThe two potsFeeding the countyThe growing frontierThe grower’s almanacThe $400K blueprintThe research shelfThe precedents
The wider network
All countiesKindred workWhere we sit in the field
How to trust this
Where we standWhat we will never doHow this is securedThe traffic logOur storyReport a problem
Open questions
Smith County · open question · open sentiment (Tier 0) · opened 2026-09-26

Our drinking water forms chlorine byproducts from the natural organic matter in its source. Should Tyler Water Utilities test a living filter — sand or soil where bacteria eat that organic matter — before treatment?

City · — advisory signal to — its city council or town meeting.

Your answer — fifteen seconds, no account, nothing asked Rules of engagement

Tap an answer. No account, nothing asked — change it anytime while your window is open.

Smith Commons · the counting room

Rules of engagement

  • One person, one voice — please vote once. No account needed; you can change your answer any time while your window stays open, and your last answer is the one that counts. Registered votes that share an email or phone collapse to the newest automatically, and the count says how many were cleared.
  • Everyone can answer. The resident question is self-reported and always labeled that way. Verification tiers come later; every count will always show how verified it is.
  • Counts update instantly. Tier 0 answers are anonymous, so exact counts identify no one and display from the very first vote. When the verified tiers arrive, small verified counts will render as ranges — in a small town, a small named count can identify people.
  • An anonymous count can be padded — we say so on purpose. Because Tier 0 takes no verification, a determined person can inflate the raw number. That is the weakness the verification tiers (phone, residency, voter-file) exist to close. Today's counts are open sentiment, never proof — and a public signature by real name is worth more than a hundred anonymous taps.
  • Registration is optional — as much or as little as you like. It has one use, stated in full where you enter it: kept private, never published, shown to a county or city official only to verify a count is real people, on request. Never sold, never anything else. Removable any time.
  • Nothing follows you home. The moment your browser window closes, this device forgets who was here — on purpose, so a shared or public computer never shows the next person your answers. Answers already counted stay counted; registered details stay safe on our server.
  • Announcing is the loud version — and always your choice. The count is anonymous, period. If you want to be heard by name, check the announce box when you register: your name, town, and answer go on the question page, petition-style — and unchecking takes them down. Self-signed and unverified until the tiers arrive; misused names removed on request, with removals logged.
  • These counts are unofficial. Not an election, not a referendum, not a petition. Their only weight is that the counting is published and checkable.
  • At 4650 responses, the result travels. We print the packet and hand-deliver it to the body that decides, and stamp the delivery publicly.
  • Bright lines. No votes on races or on live ballot measures, no campaign language, and nothing aimed at non-elected staff. Elected officials and candidates can be named and their conduct raised; every candidate in a race gets the same treatment. The platform computes and cites; it never takes sides.
  • Every count is checkable — the tally is re-added in public and the activity log is hash-chained and anchored where we can't rewrite it.

The count so far — aggregate only, always

AnswerCount
Yes0
No0
Skip0

0 total · all Tier 0 (open sentiment) · all via web · updates instantly

Who's answering, self-reported (not verified): 0 live in Smith County · 0 work here · 0 have family here · 0 other or unsaid

0 of 4650 neighbors — at 4650 it goes to the body that decides0%

Every answer moves this bar in real time — including yours. At 4650, the result is printed and hand-delivered.

Tier 0 means open sentiment: it shows how visitors lean, and it is never cited as verified resident opinion. Phone, residency, and voter verification tiers arrive with the full voting layer — and results will always display every tier's count separately.

These counts are unofficial: gathered by an independent community platform, not by any government. This is not an election, a referendum, or a legal petition — its only weight is that the counting is published and checkable.

Plainly: because a Tier 0 answer takes no verification, a determined person can pad this number — that is exactly the weakness the verification tiers (phone, residency, voter-file) are built to close. Until then, treat these as open sentiment, never proof, and weigh the public signatures — real names, by choice — more heavily than the raw count.

Proposed solutions — cited, and voted yes or no

This is where the question turns into proposals. Anyone can file a clear, concise solution moving forward — backed by documents, research, or a worked-out idea, with its sources. Everyone else clicks yes or no. No comment threads: ideas rise on their sources and their count, not on who argues loudest.

Pilot a living filter ahead of treatment for one season ▲ 0   ▼ 0
researched by the platform · every claim cited

A pilot at the Golden Road or Lake Palestine plant: a small biological or slow-sand filter ahead of treatment, measuring organic carbon and byproducts before and after. Tyler draws from lakes, so riverbank filtration doesn’t apply; living wetlands upstream are less proven for drinking water and would need their own study.

0 votes · yes or no, no comment needed
File a solution — clear, concise, cited

Filed solutions are public and screened against the bright lines. Your name isn't attached — it stands on its sources.

Make it count for more — optional, always

Your answer is already counted, anonymously. If you want it to weigh more, tell us who's answering — and, if you like, put your name on it like a petition. All optional.

Answer the question above first — then this opens up.

Put your name on it — optional, petition-style

A registered answer is the kind an official can't wave off. Every field is optional — leave what you like.

The only use of this information, in full: it stays in a private file on our server, separate from the votes, and is never published anywhere — with one exception that is always yours to choose: the announce box puts your name, town, and answer on the question page, until you uncheck it. The one other use — the reason registration exists — is to let a count be verified as real people the way a petition's signatures can be checked: if an official questions whether a result is genuine, we can confirm the registrations behind it are real, and only that. Never sold, never handed to anyone for any other purpose, never used for marketing. Remove yours any time: brayden.ozark@gmail.com.

Signed publicly — the loud version: optional, always

The count above is anonymous and stays that way. Signing is the separate, louder act — your name and your answer, on the page, like a petition on a counter. Answer the question first, then sign it if you want to be heard by name.

Signatures are self-given and unverified until the verification tiers arrive. If a signature misuses your name, email brayden.ozark@gmail.com and we will remove it — removals are logged on the public record like everything else.

Share it — a question travels farther than a website

QR code linking to this question

Send a neighbor straight to this question — they land right here, answer in fifteen seconds, done. Text it, post it, print the code for the counter or the church bulletin.

countycommons.us/issues/living-filter-tyler

During early access: the site asks for a door code — send it along with the link (you know it if you're reading this). When they enter it, the door opens onto this exact page.

The traction rule: at 4650 responses, the result gets printed and hand-delivered to the relevant body, and the delivery is stamped on the docket. 0 of 4650 and counting — every share moves it.

The context — why this question exists

Tyler’s 2025 report shows trihalomethanes at a highest average of 58 ppb (limit 80), and organic carbon in its lake water as high as 8.81 mg/L — the raw material byproducts form from. A living filter takes out part of that organic matter before the chlorine goes in. It isn’t enough by itself, and results vary by site — which is why the first step is a pilot. The evidence and the limits are on the water page.

Disclosures — the platform holds itself to its own standard

Bright lines that apply to every question here: no votes on races or on live ballot measures, no campaign language, and nothing aimed at non-elected staff. Elected officials can be named. The raw submission and any wording history are logged in the platform's public repository.