🗺 Every page — the whole flow
The votes
Open questionsElections — when, where, howVoter turnoutPriorities boardWhat came of itGet involved
The budget
▶ Take the 2-minute tourThe money trailYour tax bill, explainedCities & townsGrants — money we could go getWho gets paidWhat the auditors reportedThe receipt — arithmetic checkedThe documentsHow every number is sourcedQuestions people ask — answered from the dataThe plain-words tour
Public needs
Our waterJails & prisons — from holding to buildingWho’s watching — cameras, plate readers, the rulesWho to call — county and state officesBy the numbers — schools, health, disaster risk, bridges, grantsHow it compares — beside similar counties and the rest of the stateWhat has worked — how the county compares, and options with a track recordFind help
Dead ends & open questions
The docketThe calendarHow complete is this county?
Research for a better county
What if we saved?Tax lab — change the taxesCommonwealth — our own moneyReceipts by railsFood sovereigntyGrow-opsThe food flywheelThe two potsFeeding the countyThe growing frontierThe grower’s almanacThe $400K blueprintThe research shelfThe precedents
The wider network
All countiesKindred workWhere we sit in the field
How to trust this
Where we standWhat we will never doHow this is securedThe traffic logOur storyReport a problem
Smith County, Texas · how it compares

How Smith County compares

Smith County measured against counties like it across the country, and against the other counties in Texas — health, money, jobs, housing, the jail, bridges, people, schools and county finances. Every figure is computed from public data and cited; “ahead” and “behind” are measured differences, not grades. For what other places have tried on each measure, see what has worked.

In short — beside 63 counties like it

“Counties like it” are metro-area counties with a similar population and a median household income near Smith County's ($71,348). Ahead or behind means more than 15% better or worse than the typical one.

Ahead of similar counties on 3 measures:

Behind similar counties on 2 measures:

About the same on 6: life expectancy, children in poverty, food insecurity, households with severe housing problems, unemployment, households with broadband internet.

People and schools — beside the same similar counties

MeasureSmith CountyTypical similar county
Population change, 2020–20246.4%
234,200 → 249,091
3.0%
School spending per student (day-to-day costs)$11,260$13,507

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 population estimates; Census Annual Survey of School System Finances (school year 2023), current spending divided by enrollment across the districts based in the county.

How Smith County compares — beside 63 counties like it

“Counties like it” means other counties in a metro area with a similar number of people and a similar median household income (about $71,348 here). Comparing with them, instead of the whole country, shows what similar places have managed. Smith County is furthest behind on adults under 65 without health insurance, residents per mental health provider.

MeasureSmith CountyTypical similar countyDoing best among similar counties
Drug overdose deaths per 100,000
ahead of similar counties
10.232.5Washington County, AR 11.2
Lancaster County, NE 13.9
Minnehaha County, SD 15.3
Life expectancy
about the same
75.4 years76.4 yearsWashington County, UT 80.2 years
Whatcom County, WA 79.6 years
Lancaster County, NE 79.1 years
Adults under 65 without health insurance
behind similar counties
18.6%9.2%Linn County, IA 4.3%
Niagara County, NY 4.4%
Westmoreland County, PA 4.7%
Residents per primary care doctor
ahead of similar counties
1,0141,588Buncombe County, NC 711
St. Louis County, MN 810
Sangamon County, IL 829
Residents per mental health provider
behind similar counties
540396Buncombe County, NC 112
Jackson County, OR 139
Whatcom County, WA 158
Children in poverty
about the same
17.1%15.3%Cass County, ND 8.0%
Lancaster County, NE 9.0%
Minnehaha County, SD 10.3%
Food insecurity
about the same
14.9%13.1%Cass County, ND 7.8%
Minnehaha County, SD 9.6%
Linn County, IA 9.7%
Households with severe housing problems
about the same
14.8%13.6%Lake County, OH 9.5%
Washington County, PA 9.6%
Westmoreland County, PA 9.9%
Unemployment
about the same
3.6%3.4%Cass County, ND 1.7%
Minnehaha County, SD 1.8%
Lancaster County, NE 2.1%
Households with broadband internet
about the same
88.8%89.9%Hall County, GA 93.1%
Whatcom County, WA 92.9%
Canyon County, ID 92.8%
Bridges rated poor
ahead of similar counties
0.7%5.6%Ector County, TX 0.0%
Houston County, GA 0.0%
Yavapai County, AZ 0.4%

“Behind” or “ahead” means more than 15% worse or better than the typical (median) similar county; small differences can be noise. Sources: County Health Rankings 2025 (health, money and internet), Vera Institute (jail, latest year from 2015 on), FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025, HUD (metro areas), Census 2024 population. What has worked elsewhere on each of these.

How Smith County compares — against the other counties in Texas

“Highest” and “lowest” are just order, not grades: a high rank for poverty or hazard losses means more of it. Each figure's source is in its section below.

Related: By the numbers · The money trail · Audits · What has worked. Spot an error? Report it.